![]() I mean, you can, but it takes years and years and cross site leaks will plague you along the way, as is the case with Firefox.įirefox has no proper site isolation – they hard-limited the content processes to eight like amateurs, meaning that different websites can still share the same process. “But this is outdated info” you might think now, to which I would reply “not quite”, because you can’t foist a multiprocess architecture unto a single process application. The truth is that Firefox used to be an outdated single process application while Chromium started out multiprocess. If Firefox is what you mean by “something better”, which I guess it is, since you are promoting it in your other posts as well… Then bruh. The critical issue was discovered in FedCM, Federated Learning with Client-level ProughĮvery single article about Chromium security updates turns into a clown parade where Firefox users try to promote their moribund browser. The remaining security issues have a rating of high or medium. The list includes a security issue with a critical severity rating. Medium CVE-2022-2861: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions API.Medium CVE-2022-2860: Insufficient policy enforcement in Cookies.Reported by Nan and Guang Gong of 360 Alpha Lab on Medium CVE-2022-2859: Use after free in Chrome OS Shell.Reported by Ashley Shen and Christian Resell of Google Threat Analysis Group on High CVE-2022-2856: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Intents.Reported by Sergei Glazunov of Google Project Zero on ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |